I know some principals that are truly charismatic. Some of
my Leadership classmates are. They love being on the stage, planning the party,
joshing with everybody. I think, “I oughta do that. I’m a leader; why aren’t I
acting like that?” But now I see that I’m equating “leader” with “charismatic”
which often involves being sanguine. Sanguine I am not. I don’t actually want
to be the life of the party, yet I have thought that I should be. Aside from
that I have full confidence in my ability to do good things. I find it much
more rewarding when a person writes to tell me that my life has improved theirs
than when I am hauled up on stage to receive applause or awards.
Suddenly a bit of history strikes me: We used to revere the “director”
type of leader, the “man with the plan.” Let’s get things done. It was a modern
world, and we were focused on progress. Now we want the “relator” type of
leader, the empathic person. Let’s just get along. It’s the postmodern world,
and we are focused on comfort. Maybe there are fads in leadership style. Does
it matter if my style is not in vogue? I don’t even need to know if it ever
will be.
What intrigues me is this question: If my discomfort has
come from being ashamed for not meeting a false image of who I should be, yet I
misread those emotions as pride… could I effect the needed changes in my life
by trying to become more humble? It might work to release the feelings of
disappointment as being pride and then turning away from them. Perhaps we often
do mislabel our deficits and work on them with the wrong tools. And maybe that
works enough of the time for us to go on and give semi-helpful advice to
others. But wouldn’t it be better for me to recognize the feelings as shame and
say, “Hey wait! I’m not trying to be that kind of a leader,” and then turn back
to the things I know I’m good at? Wouldn’t that strike closer to the root of
the disappointment and more easily redirect my focus to whatever I should do
next?
In the meantime, I think, “Yes, I have been leading, and I
have loved and been loved by those who worked with me. And I did it in my own
skin. That’s enough.” I vowed to quit feeling bad about not being a personality
I really don’t want to be. I love sanguines and charismatics, just as I love gazelles,
but I don’t aspire to be them. Instead, I want to trust in the talents He gave
me. If they are good for leading somewhere, He’ll make sure I end up there. If
they are better suited to something else, I’ll gladly go there. I can quit
thinking of leadership and simply be whatever He wants in the moment.
You are who you are - and that IS a good leader. You DO let God guide you to be what He wants in that moment. I have witnessed that. I am thankful for the leader you have been the last 12 years. And I, for sure, don't want you to be Sanguine! :)
ReplyDelete